## 12.1 – The other side of the mountain

How many of you remember your high school calculus? Does the word differentiation and integration ring a bell? The word ‘Derivatives’ meant something else to all of us back then – it simply referred to solving lengthy differentiation and integration problems.

Let me attempt to refresh your memory – the idea here is to just drive a certain point across and not really get into the technicalities of solving a calculus problem. Please note, the following discussion is very relevant to options, so please do read on.

Consider this –

A car is set into motion; it starts from 0 kms travels for 10 minutes and reaches the 3^{rd} kilometer mark. From the 3^{rd} kilometer mark, the car travels for another 5 minutes and reaches the 7^{th} kilometer mark.

Let us focus and note what really happens between the **3 ^{rd} and 7^{th} kilometer**, –

- Let ‘x’ = distance, and ‘dx’ the change in distance
- Change in distance i.e. ‘dx’, is 4 (7 – 3)
- Let ‘t’ = time, and ‘dt’ the change in time
- Change in time i.e. ‘dt’, is 5 (15 – 10)

If we divide **dx over dt** i.e. change in distance over change in time we get ‘Velocity’ (V)!

V = dx / dt

= 4/5

This means the car is travelling 4Kms for every 5 Minutes. Here the velocity is being expressed in Kms travelled per minute, clearly this is not a convention we use in our day to day conversation as we are used to express speed or velocity in Kms travelled per hour (KMPH).

We can convert 4/5 to KMPH by making a simple mathematical adjustment –

5 minutes when expressed in hours equals 5/60 hours, plugging this back in the above equation

= 4 / (5/ 60)

= (4*60)/5

= 48 Kmph

Hence the car is moving at a velocity of 48 kmph (kilometers per hour).

Do remember Velocity is **change in distance travelled divided over change in time**. In the calculus world, the Speed or Velocity is called the ‘**1 ^{st} order derivative**’ of distance travelled.

Now, let us take this example forward – In the 1^{st} leg of the journey the car reached the 7^{th} Kilometer after 15 minutes. Further assume in the 2^{nd} leg of journey, starting from the 7^{th} kilometer mark the car travels for another 5 minutes and reaches the 15^{th} kilometer mark.

We know the velocity of the car in the first leg was 48 kmph, and we can easily calculate the velocity for the 2^{nd} leg of the journey as 96 kmph (here dx = 8 and dt = 5).

It is quite obvious that the car travelled twice as fast in the 2^{nd} leg of the journey.

Let us call the change in velocity as ‘dv’. Change in velocity as we know is also called ‘Acceleration’.

We know the change in velocity is

= 96KMPH – 48 KMPH

= 48 KMPH /??

The above answer suggests that the change in velocity is 48 KMPH…. but over what? Confusing right?

Let me explain –

** *The following explanation may seem like a digression from the main topic about Gamma, but it is not, so please read on, if not for anything it will refresh your high school physics ☺* **

When you want to buy a new car, the first thing the sales guy tells you is something like this – “the car is really fast as it can accelerate 0 to 60 in 5 seconds”. Essentially he is telling you that the car can change velocity from 0 KMPH (from the state of complete rest) to 60 KMPH in 5 seconds. Change in velocity here is 60KMPH (60 – 0) **over 5 seconds**.

Likewise in the above example we know the change in velocity is 48KMPH but over what? Unless we answer “over what” part, we would not know what the acceleration really is.

To find out the acceleration in this particular case, we can make some assumptions –

- Acceleration is constant
- We can ignore the 7
^{th}kilometer mark for time being – hence we consider the fact that the car was at 3^{rd}kilometer mark at the 10^{th}minute and it reached the 15^{th}kilometer mark at the 20^{th}minute

Using the above information, we can further deduce more information (in the calculus world, these are called the ‘initial conditions’).

- Velocity @ the 10
^{th}minute (or 3^{rd}kilometer mark) = 0 KMPS. This is called the initial velocity - Time lapsed @ the 3
^{rd}kilometer mark = 10 minutes - Acceleration is constant between the 3
^{rd}and 15^{th}kilometer mark - Time at 15
^{th}kilometer mark = 20 minutes - Velocity @ 20
^{th}minute (or 15^{th}kilometer marks) is called ‘Final Velocity” - While we know the initial velocity was 0 kmph, we do not know the final velocity
- Total distance travelled = 15 – 3 = 12 kms
- Total driving time = 20 -10 = 10 minutes
- Average speed (velocity) = 12/10 = 1.2 kmps per minute or in terms of hours it would be 72 kmph

Now think about this, we know –

- Initial velocity = 0 kmph
- Average velocity = 72 kmph
- Final velocity =??

By reverse engineering we know the final velocity should be 144 Kmph as the average of 0 and 144 is 72.

Further we know acceleration is calculated as = Final Velocity / time (provided acceleration is constant).

Hence the acceleration is –

= 144 kmph / 10 minutes

10 minutes when converted to hours is (10/60) hours, plugging this back in the above equation

= 144 kmph / (10/60) hour

= 864 Kilometers **per hour. **

This means the car is gaining a speed of 864 kilometers every hour, and if a salesman is selling you this car, he would say the car can accelerate 0 to 72kmph in 5 secs (I’ll let you do this math).

We simplified this problem a great deal by making one assumption – acceleration is constant. However in reality acceleration is not constant, you accelerate at different speeds for obvious reasons. Generally speaking, to calculate such problems **involving change in one variable due to the change in another variable** one would have to dig into derivative calculus, more precisely one needs to use the concept of ‘differential equations’.

Now just think about this for a moment –

We know change in distance travelled (position) = Velocity, this is also called the 1^{st} order derivative of distance position.

Change in Velocity = Acceleration

Acceleration = Change in Velocity over time, which is in turn the change in position over time.

Hence it is apt to call Acceleration as the 2^{nd} order derivative of the position or the 1^{st} derivative of Velocity!

Keep this point about the 1^{st} order derivative and 2^{nd} order derivative in perspective as we now proceed to understand the Gamma.

## 12.2 – Drawing Parallels

Over the last few chapters we understood how Delta of an option works. Delta as we know represents the change in premium for the given change in the underlying price.

For example if the Nifty spot value is 8000, then we know the 8200 CE option is OTM, hence its delta could be a value between 0 and 0.5. Let us fix this to 0.2 for the sake of this discussion.

Assume Nifty spot jumps 300 points in a single day, this means the 8200 CE is no longer an OTM option, rather it becomes slightly ITM option and therefore by virtue of this jump in spot value, the delta of 8200 CE will no longer be 0.2, it would be somewhere between 0.5 and 1.0, let us assume 0.8.

With this change in underlying, one thing is very clear – **the delta itself changes**. Meaning delta is a variable, whose value changes based on the changes in the underlying and the premium! If you notice, Delta is very similar to velocity whose value changes with change in time and the distance travelled.

The Gamma of an option measures this change in delta for the given change in the underlying. In other words Gamma of an option helps us answer this question – “For a given change in the underlying, what will be the corresponding change in the delta of the option?”

Now, let us re-plug the velocity and acceleration example and draw some parallels to Delta and Gamma.

**1 ^{st} order Derivative**

- Change in distance travelled (position) with respect to change in time is captured by velocity, and velocity is called the 1
^{st}order derivative of position - Change in premium with respect to change in underlying is captured by delta, and hence delta is called the 1
^{st}order derivative of the premium

**2 ^{nd} order Derivative**

- Change in velocity with respect to change in time is captured by acceleration, and acceleration is called the 2
^{nd}order derivative of position - Change in delta is with respect to change in the underlying value is captured by Gamma, hence Gamma is called the 2
^{nd}order derivative of the premium

As you can imagine, calculating the values of Delta and Gamma (and in fact all other Option Greeks) involves number crunching and heavy use of calculus (differential equations and stochastic calculus).

Here is a trivia for you – as we know, derivatives are called derivatives because the derivative contracts derives its value based on the value of its respective underlying.

This value that the derivatives contracts derive from its respective underlying is measured using the application of “Derivatives” as a mathematical concept, hence the reason why Futures & Options are referred to as ‘Derivatives’ ☺.

You may be interested to know there is a parallel trading universe out there where traders apply derivative calculus to find trading opportunities day in and day out. In the trading world, such traders are generally called ‘Quants’, quite a fancy nomenclature I must say. Quantitative trading is what really exists on the other side of this mountain called ‘Markets’.

From my experience, understanding the 2^{nd} order derivative such as Gamma is not an easy task, although we will try and simplify it as much as possible in the subsequent chapters.

### Key takeaways from this chapter

- Financial derivatives are called Financial derivatives because of its dependence on calculus and differential equations (generally called Derivatives)
- Delta of an option is a variable and changes for every change in the underlying and premium
- Gamma captures the rate of change of delta, it helps us get an answer for a question such as “What is the expected value of delta for a given change in underlying”
- Delta is the 1
^{st}order derivative of premium - Gamma is the 2
^{nd}order derivative of premium

sir,how to draw mave on volume chart$what is pattern recognition &its not working in PI

Just drag the MA indicator on volumes and you get it. It works on Pi.

your content is excellent one request can you please convert all the chapters into PDF files so that one can easily refer when ever possible

We are in the process of converting each module into downloadable PDF’s and ibook format. Its available for the first 3 modules…work is on for the rest.

Hi kartik,

Very very thanks for this chapter .This is some different, more interesting and a mathematical chapter. I love mathematical topics. I have read this chapter 5 times and drew following conclusion. Kindly check it and correct me where I am wrong.

Let nifty is at 8000. If we buy Nifty8200 CE at premium of rs. 100. If delta is 0.2. if nifty goes up to 8300 then,

Change in underlying =300 (8300-8000)

New premium =250

Change in premium = 150 (250-100)

DELTA = CHANGE IN PREMIUM / CHANGE IN UNDERLYING = 150/300 =1/2= 0.5

GAMMA= CHANGE IN DELTA / CHANGE IN UNDERLYING = (0.5-0.2)/300= 0.3/300 = 1/1000 = 0.001

CONCLUSION,

• This means for every one point change in nifty, premium changes by 0.5 points

• Also, for every one point change in nifty, delta changes by 0.001 points

• Clearly delta is First order derivative of premium and gamma is second order derivative of premium.

Really appreciate your enthusiasm and eagerness to learn 🙂

Some corrections –

If delta = 0.2

Change in underlying = 300

Premium = 100

Change in premium will be = 300 * 0.2 = 60

New premium = 100+60 = 160

You are broadly on the right path here…but please do wait for the next chapter and you will develop complete clarity on this matter. Thanks for your patience.

Sir clearly,

Change in premium= change in underlying*delta = 0.2*300=60

New premium= 100+60=160

But, how do we calculate new delta and also how do we calculate gamma

Please upload next chapter as soon as possible. I want to get clear concept on this topic.

I’ll try my best to get the next chapter up this week, thanks for your patience.

The screen is very Dim. Even when what i am typing can not read. Need to use constant lense. It is really tiresome. Can you please improve visibility.

Sir, we have used maximum possible white space in this initiative. Having a lot of white space increases visibility. I’m not sure whatelse can be done, however I will check with my technical colleagues if there is any solution to this.

Hi Karthik, we can’t thank you enough for making the content so detailed and comprehensible! You’re going to make turn us into complete pros : ) While I’ve already started using the delta and theta concepts to shape my options strategy, factoring in the gamma factor will be a heavy-duty number crunching exercise. Please help me out with this one part: If I sell an ATM Call and Put (both having a delta of about 0.5 — positive for the Call and negative for the Put) of the Bank Nifty, how many points (approximately) does the price have to move:

a. to turn one delta into 0.4 and the other into 0.6?

b. to turn one delta into 0.3 and the other into 0.7?

c. to turn one delta into 0.2 and the other into 0.8?

Thanks!

Delta of call ATM = + 0.5

Delta of Put ATM = -0.5

But when you short…

Delta of call ATM = – 0.5

Delta of Put ATM = + 0.5

Total position delta = -0.5 + 0.5 = 0

This means irrespective of much the market moves, the position will not get affected, because delta is 0. In other words, the position is delta neutral.

For example if nifty moves 100 points +ve

Change in premium = delta * number of points moved

= 0 * 100

= 0

However, after the 100 point move the positions will

no longer be delta neutral. This is because delta itself changes due to gamma. From your question, I get a feeling you are clear upto this point.However I would request you to please wait a little longer to get specific answers 🙂

Ahaa…so “100 points” is the answer to to the first part (a)? Oh please say yes! I promise to be patient after that.

Working out an answer for you 🙂 Determined to finish the chapter 13 today !

Sir I salute you. Thank you so much for so clear explaination.

Stay tuned Pravin, more stuff coming up 🙂

H ii kartik

When will you upload next chapter. I am very excited for it.

Lots of uploads expected this week 🙂

absolutely marvellous,sir!I’m a new member of zerodha jus went abt a window-shopping spree on this site(oh!site surfing,shall i say)gr8 learning experience.if not for anything then certainly the calculus made me nostalgic.keep up the gud work

Glad to know that Prasad, please stay tuned for more!

Dear Karthik ,

I am very new to the world of stock trading , in simple words just on the learning phase , I saw amazing collection of your articles on trading right from basics , Its awesome to read them and learn right from basics , just wanted to know if the chapters from 1 to 12 all available in form of pdf or combined book ? i could only see first 3 in form of a book .

Please let me know if PDF or your articles are compiled in form of a book …

Regards

Padmesh

Thanks for the kind words and encouragement. We are working on converting the docs into PDF. In due course everything will be made available.

nice explanation waiting for next chapters

Keep up the excellent work

Thank you! New chapter will be out this week.

Good one. Waiting for some more lessons.

Very soon, thanks for your patience 🙂

I am going to sum up what I have learned so far about option trading and kindly correct me if I am wrong.

To do options trading we need to have a directional view about the underlying stock or index and for doing this we have to look into the charts of the underlying stock or index i.e. do Technical Analysis.

After making a directional view about the stock or index we have to select what we want to do, whether (buy a call option or sell a put option) or (write a call option or buy a put option) and for doing this we need to learn about option pricing.

To learn about option pricing we need to learn about option greeks and Black & Scholes Option Pricing Model.

You seem to get the flow right here. However very soon there will be a twist to this tale 🙂

Just to give you a heads up – To trade options you need to have a directional view on either markets or on Volatility! Please stay tuned for more.

Thanks for replying Sir.

All this knowledge is just because of you.

Thanks again.

All this knowledge is because of your eagerness to learn and not because of me 🙂

I’m doing final year MBA in finance & my plan is to become a professional trader. Already I’m doing swing trading in options(only) with zerodha & getting descent returns. To become well versed in options trading, varsity will pave the good way.As iam having the better financial background, I want to learn the options in depth. Can you suggest the best books which can fulfill my req…

http://tradingqna.com/754/which-are-the-top-books-one-should-read-become-better-trader

you can refer to this link

Thanks for that link Harshendra! I had forgotten about it 🙂

Glad to know this Vijayan, this is a great book on Options – http://www.amazon.com/Option-Volatility-amp-Pricing-Strategies/dp/155738486X

As I am new to Options, will I be able to understand the topics covered in the above book u have mentioned. Because I am sure the explaining art will not be as lucid as yours is Karthik:)

Thanks for that Sumeet 🙂

By the way, that book is a classic. I’ve personally learnt a lot by reading that book.

Sir, Two editions are available.. First & updated second, kindly check & suggest the edition..

Updated 2nd should be good.

I remember seeing the terms long gamma and short gamma somewhere in this module. However I am unable to find them. Could you please tell me where the the terms appear for the first time?

Thank You.

It must be in the same chapter 🙂

Hello,

Truly a great blog by karthi Rangappa. Thanks a lot for doing so much for trading community.

I have some doubts here.

“We know the velocity of the car in the first leg was 48 kmph”

I guess it should be 28kmph right ??? Based on that whole calculation changes for me.

“Velocity @ the 10th minute (or 3rd kilometer mark) = 0 KMPS”

Velocity at 10th minute after 3 kms shoud be 18 KMPH right ??? Only that shouls be taken as initial velocity, because the car is already in motion ?

Thanks and Regards,

Soorrya

I wont be surprised if I’ve made any silly mistakes in this example…not really a physicist 🙂

Hi Sir’s,

Thank for demystifying options for amateurs. One query, earlier we were able to download the pdf versions of the entire modules, however, no I dont see the download link anymore. Could you please help me with this. Thanks

Will get back the PDFs next week, Nikhil.

Dear Sir,

Thank you for appending the pdf version of the modules. If it not too much of an ask, can we create a similar document for all the Q&A portion for all chapters (consolidated per module as a document). I feel these questions will add value to one’s learning experience.

Thank you again for all the hard work towards investor education.

Regards

Nikhil

I agree that would make sense Nikhil, but that would take away a lot of bandwidth. Not sure if we can afford to do that at this point.

Hi ,

As per the below calculations ;

Velocity @ the 10th minute (or 3rd kilometer mark) = 0 KMPS. This is called the initial velocity

Time lapsed @ the 3rd kilometer mark = 10 minutes

Acceleration is constant between the 3rd and 15th kilometer mark

Time at 15th kilometer mark = 20 minutes

Velocity @ 20th minute (or 15th kilometer marks) is called ‘Final Velocity”

While we know the initial velocity was 0 kmph, we do not know the final velocity

Total distance travelled = 15 – 3 = 12 kms

Total driving time = 20 -10 = 10 minutes

Average speed (velocity) = 12/10 = 1.2 kmps per minute or in terms of hours it would be 72 kmph

the total driving time is 20 min so in the picture shown for illustration above the time between 3KM mark to 15KM mark should be shown as 10 min (20 min is cumulative from 0 KM) right ?

Thanks,

Sandeep

Yes sir – as long as you get the drift 🙂

Very Confused With This Chapter Sir. My 1st Question Is Why The Initial Velocity Is 0? Here DX/DT Is 3*60/10. My 2nd Question Is If A Car Is Travelling Ar 864 Kmph The Acceleration Should Be Be 72 Kmph In 5 Min Not In 5 Sec. Can You Please Explain.

I Dnt Even Remember What Calculus Is. Are You suggesting To Learn Calculus First?

If the acceleration is 864kmph, when converting into seconds it would be 864/3600 which equals 0.24 kmps. Multiplying this by 5 seconds would give 1.2 km per 5 seconds which gives 0 to 72 kmph only at 5 minutes right? Please help, im very anxious to know 🙂

Lol, I’m not a physics guy, Ashish. It was my lame attempt to explain Gamma of an option. Please spare me the math 🙂

Haha okay. I love the whole varsity series! The explanation is spot on! Please write more on advanced topics of economics and the stock market, or for that matter anything that you want to write about. I will definitely read it, your content is delightful. Cheers Karthik!

Thanks for the kind words, Ashish 🙂

Happy learning!

If the acceleration is 864kmph, when converting into seconds it would be 864/3600 which equals 0.24 kmps. Multiplying this by 5 seconds would give 1.2 km per 5 seconds which gives 0 to 72 kmph only at 5 minutes right? Please help, im very anxious to know 🙂

Also, the acceleration should be 864 km/square hour considering unit of acceleration is m/s^2. However I still dont understand how you get 0 to 72kmph in 5 seconds. I know in the grand scheme of things, this is a very trivial question. But for me, trivial things matter 🙂

Hi Karthik, few queries regarding quants

1. does quant trading occupies a major chunk in international markets?

2. how about indian markets ? does quant trading outweighs retail and other institutional trades?

Just curious to know the extent of impact quant trading has created 🙂

1) Yes, it does.

2) Its gaining popularity now. You can check this for exact details – https://www.nseindia.com/content/equities/cm_mode_of_trading.pdf , most of the Algos employ quant strategies.

Good luck.

In your personal opinion is option trading more profitable then intraday trading in equities ? Also at this point i think options trading is less risky then intraday trading in equity and more importance can be given to risk management in options trading. Is this correct ?

I’d always prefer options!