- Markets
- Textiles
- MKPMOB
MKPMOB
New to Zerodha? Sign-up for free.
New to Zerodha? Sign-up for free.
-
Share Price
-
Financials
-
Revenue mix
-
Shareholdings
-
Peers
-
Forensics
- 5D
- 1M
- 6M
- YTD
- 1Y
- 5Y
- MAX
This data is currently unavailable for this company.
-
Summary
-
Profit & Loss
-
Balance sheet
-
Cashflow
This data is currently unavailable for this company.
(In Cr.) |
---|
(In Cr.) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
This data is currently unavailable for this company. |
(In %) |
---|
(In Cr.) |
---|
Financial Year (In Cr.) |
---|
-
Product wise
-
Location wise
Revenue Mix
This data is currently unavailable for this company.
Revenue Mix
This data is currently unavailable for this company.
Recent events
-
News
-
Corporate Actions
Spanish court wants BBVA and former chairman to face trial in spying case
Court also wants former BBVA chairman to stand trial
Wants to try both for bribery, disclosure of firm secrets
BBVA was placed under investigation in July of 2019
Adds comment from BBVA in paragraph 4
By Jesús Aguado
MADRID, June 20 (Reuters) - A Spanish High Court judge proposed Spain's second-largest lender BBVA BBVA.MC and its former chairman stand trial for alleged bribery and disclosure of company secrets following a probe into alleged corporate spying, a court document released on Thursday showed.
BBVA was placed under investigation in July 2019 for hiring a private investigation agency allegedly run by former Police Commissioner Jose Manuel Villarejo. The case is part of a wider probe dating back to 2004 into Villarejo, who has denied wrongdoing.
Legal representatives for ex-Chairman Francisco Gonzalez declined to comment.
A BBVA spokesperson said no criminal liability "arises for the entity from the events under investigation" and its priority has always been to cooperate fully with the courts.
None of the bank's current board were involved in the investigation.
In a 247-page court ruling following the investigation, Judge Manuel Garcia Castellon proposed to try BBVA and Gonzalez for "bribery crimes and a series of crimes such as revealing and disclosing secrets on the hiring of Villarejo to carry out various illegal assignments between 2004 and 2016."
The ruling can be appealed.
The prosecutor of the case has to request penalties he considers BBVA and Gonzalez would have to face before the judge formally orders the opening of a trial.
Gonzalez was BBVA chairman at the time the bank hired the agency. He temporarily stepped down as honorary chairman in March 2019 to prevent any harm to the bank's reputation. He has denied wrongdoing.
BBVA previously confirmed it hired the agency but said it had found no evidence of spying. Prosecutors allege the bank paid the agency more than 10 million euros ($10.85 million).
BBVA is the country's second-largest bank by market value after Banco Santander SAN.MC. Last month, it announced a 12 billion euro ($13 billion) bid for Banco Sabadell SABE.MC.
In a recent report, advisory firm MKP said it was worth monitoring any ongoing reputational damage from the court case though said it was "hard" to envisage an impact of the case on the approval of the Sabadell acquisition.
In its 2021 annual report, BBVA said it could not predict the outcome or implications of the case, including fines or reputational damage.
(Reporting by Jesús Aguado; additional reporting by Emma Pinedo; editing by Aislinn Laing, Andrei Khalip, Elaine Hardcastle and Richard Chang)
(([email protected]; +34 91 835 68 32; Reuters Messaging: Reuters Messaging: [email protected]))
Court also wants former BBVA chairman to stand trial
Wants to try both for bribery, disclosure of firm secrets
BBVA was placed under investigation in July of 2019
Adds comment from BBVA in paragraph 4
By Jesús Aguado
MADRID, June 20 (Reuters) - A Spanish High Court judge proposed Spain's second-largest lender BBVA BBVA.MC and its former chairman stand trial for alleged bribery and disclosure of company secrets following a probe into alleged corporate spying, a court document released on Thursday showed.
BBVA was placed under investigation in July 2019 for hiring a private investigation agency allegedly run by former Police Commissioner Jose Manuel Villarejo. The case is part of a wider probe dating back to 2004 into Villarejo, who has denied wrongdoing.
Legal representatives for ex-Chairman Francisco Gonzalez declined to comment.
A BBVA spokesperson said no criminal liability "arises for the entity from the events under investigation" and its priority has always been to cooperate fully with the courts.
None of the bank's current board were involved in the investigation.
In a 247-page court ruling following the investigation, Judge Manuel Garcia Castellon proposed to try BBVA and Gonzalez for "bribery crimes and a series of crimes such as revealing and disclosing secrets on the hiring of Villarejo to carry out various illegal assignments between 2004 and 2016."
The ruling can be appealed.
The prosecutor of the case has to request penalties he considers BBVA and Gonzalez would have to face before the judge formally orders the opening of a trial.
Gonzalez was BBVA chairman at the time the bank hired the agency. He temporarily stepped down as honorary chairman in March 2019 to prevent any harm to the bank's reputation. He has denied wrongdoing.
BBVA previously confirmed it hired the agency but said it had found no evidence of spying. Prosecutors allege the bank paid the agency more than 10 million euros ($10.85 million).
BBVA is the country's second-largest bank by market value after Banco Santander SAN.MC. Last month, it announced a 12 billion euro ($13 billion) bid for Banco Sabadell SABE.MC.
In a recent report, advisory firm MKP said it was worth monitoring any ongoing reputational damage from the court case though said it was "hard" to envisage an impact of the case on the approval of the Sabadell acquisition.
In its 2021 annual report, BBVA said it could not predict the outcome or implications of the case, including fines or reputational damage.
(Reporting by Jesús Aguado; additional reporting by Emma Pinedo; editing by Aislinn Laing, Andrei Khalip, Elaine Hardcastle and Richard Chang)
(([email protected]; +34 91 835 68 32; Reuters Messaging: Reuters Messaging: [email protected]))
UPDATE 6-Exxon signals potential counter offer for Hess's Guyana assets
Exxon pursues arbitration over deal with international tribunal
Filing could be tactic to win Chevron concessions, says analyst
Adds comment in 6th paragraph, share reaction
By Sabrina Valle
HOUSTON, March 6 (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil Corp XOM.N on Wednesday said it filed a contract arbitration claim related to Hess Corp's HES.N proposed sale of its Guyana oil properties, and suggested it may counter Chevron Corp's pending deal for the assets.
The arbitration case seeks to preserve Exxon's right to evaluate making a bid for Hess's 30% stake in the giant Stabroek offshore oil block if Chevron CVX.N proceeds with its proposed $53 billion Hess purchase, Senior Vice President Neil Chapman said in a conference on Wednesday.
Stabroek, which is consider the largest oil discovery in decades, is the prize in Chevron's bid for Hess. Exxon made clear for the first time it could bid for the Hess's Guyana properties.
"I don't know if the Chevron transaction is going to proceed or not, that is in their hands," Chapman said at a Morgan Stanley event in New York. "If there is a transaction, we plan to exert our preemption rights," he said.
Those rights, part of the consortium's operating agreement, he said, "give us the opportunity to look at the value, which we can then match should we choose to do so."
Exxon declined to comment whether it would bid for Hess assets if Chevron's deal does not proceed for any reason.
Chevron and Hess have said they believe the rights do not apply as the transaction would involve a merger with the parent company that would keep Hess's Guyana subsidiary intact.
“We remain fully committed to the transaction, and are confident in our position. We look forward to closing the transaction on the terms we’ve agreed,” Chevron spokesperson Braden Reddall said in a statement.
Chevron's bid for Hess is "an attempt to circumvent" the joint operating agreement that governs the partners' roles in the Stabroek block, Chapman said.
Exxon's challenge could prove fruitful even if it does not end up enlarging the oil company's holdings, analysts have said.
Its arbitration filing "could be a negotiating stance," said Mark Kelly, CEO of financial firm MKP Advisors.
Wednesday's drop in Hess stock "suggests that the market is somewhat happy to take them at their word," Kelly said, and that Exxon could have a right to own Hess Guyana assets if Chevron wants to buy it.
Hess shares dropped more than 2% on Wednesday, Chevron shares fell less than 1% and Exxon shares rose 1%.
Exxon now holds a 45% stake in the consortium and operates all of its production. If it bought Hess's share, it would hold 75% of the block.
A contract arbitration case typically takes six months or more, Chapman said.
The company has been negotiating with Chevron and Hess over its right of first refusal to any sale of Hess's Stabroek stake. It formally filed for arbitration on Wednesday with the International Chamber of Commerce, he said.
"We, as participant (in the block), have the rights to match a reasonable allocation of the value of the Hess transaction," Chapman said.
Asked if talks with Chevron would continue and if there were chances of a negotiated agreement before the arbitration process ends, Chapman said that "disputes take place all the time, and they get resolved."
"The only real difference is this is in the public domain," he said.
The largest U.S. oil company is awaiting regulatory approval for its $60 billion proposed purchase of Pioneer Natural Resources. That deal would make Exxon the largest oil producer in the top U.S. oil field.
(Reporting by Sabrina Valle; Editing by David Gregorio)
(([email protected]; Twitter: @sabrinavalle;))
Exxon pursues arbitration over deal with international tribunal
Filing could be tactic to win Chevron concessions, says analyst
Adds comment in 6th paragraph, share reaction
By Sabrina Valle
HOUSTON, March 6 (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil Corp XOM.N on Wednesday said it filed a contract arbitration claim related to Hess Corp's HES.N proposed sale of its Guyana oil properties, and suggested it may counter Chevron Corp's pending deal for the assets.
The arbitration case seeks to preserve Exxon's right to evaluate making a bid for Hess's 30% stake in the giant Stabroek offshore oil block if Chevron CVX.N proceeds with its proposed $53 billion Hess purchase, Senior Vice President Neil Chapman said in a conference on Wednesday.
Stabroek, which is consider the largest oil discovery in decades, is the prize in Chevron's bid for Hess. Exxon made clear for the first time it could bid for the Hess's Guyana properties.
"I don't know if the Chevron transaction is going to proceed or not, that is in their hands," Chapman said at a Morgan Stanley event in New York. "If there is a transaction, we plan to exert our preemption rights," he said.
Those rights, part of the consortium's operating agreement, he said, "give us the opportunity to look at the value, which we can then match should we choose to do so."
Exxon declined to comment whether it would bid for Hess assets if Chevron's deal does not proceed for any reason.
Chevron and Hess have said they believe the rights do not apply as the transaction would involve a merger with the parent company that would keep Hess's Guyana subsidiary intact.
“We remain fully committed to the transaction, and are confident in our position. We look forward to closing the transaction on the terms we’ve agreed,” Chevron spokesperson Braden Reddall said in a statement.
Chevron's bid for Hess is "an attempt to circumvent" the joint operating agreement that governs the partners' roles in the Stabroek block, Chapman said.
Exxon's challenge could prove fruitful even if it does not end up enlarging the oil company's holdings, analysts have said.
Its arbitration filing "could be a negotiating stance," said Mark Kelly, CEO of financial firm MKP Advisors.
Wednesday's drop in Hess stock "suggests that the market is somewhat happy to take them at their word," Kelly said, and that Exxon could have a right to own Hess Guyana assets if Chevron wants to buy it.
Hess shares dropped more than 2% on Wednesday, Chevron shares fell less than 1% and Exxon shares rose 1%.
Exxon now holds a 45% stake in the consortium and operates all of its production. If it bought Hess's share, it would hold 75% of the block.
A contract arbitration case typically takes six months or more, Chapman said.
The company has been negotiating with Chevron and Hess over its right of first refusal to any sale of Hess's Stabroek stake. It formally filed for arbitration on Wednesday with the International Chamber of Commerce, he said.
"We, as participant (in the block), have the rights to match a reasonable allocation of the value of the Hess transaction," Chapman said.
Asked if talks with Chevron would continue and if there were chances of a negotiated agreement before the arbitration process ends, Chapman said that "disputes take place all the time, and they get resolved."
"The only real difference is this is in the public domain," he said.
The largest U.S. oil company is awaiting regulatory approval for its $60 billion proposed purchase of Pioneer Natural Resources. That deal would make Exxon the largest oil producer in the top U.S. oil field.
(Reporting by Sabrina Valle; Editing by David Gregorio)
(([email protected]; Twitter: @sabrinavalle;))
Events:
More Micro Cap Ideas
See similar 'Micro' cap companies with recent activity
Promoter Buying
Companies where the promoters are bullish
Capex
Companies investing on expansion
Superstar Investor
Companies where well known investors have invested
Popular questions
-
Business
-
Financials
-
Share Price
-
Shareholdings
What does MKP Mobility do?
MKP Mobility Limited, formerly known as Chitradurga Spintex Limited, shifted its business focus from textile spinning to a diverse range including automotive parts, power generation, and infrastructure projects.
Who are the competitors of MKP Mobility?
MKP Mobility major competitors are PBM Polytex, GTN Inds, Suryaamba Spg Mills, Katare Spg Mills, Laxmi Cotspin, Gujarat Hy-Spin, Sparkle Gold Rock. Market Cap of MKP Mobility is ₹51 Crs. While the median market cap of its peers are ₹46 Crs.
Is MKP Mobility financially stable compared to its competitors?
MKP Mobility seems to be financially stable compared to its competitors. The probability of it going bankrupt or facing a financial crunch seem to be lower than its immediate competitors.
Does MKP Mobility pay decent dividends?
The company seems to be paying a very low dividend. Investors need to see where the company is allocating its profits. MKP Mobility latest dividend payout ratio is 0% and 3yr average dividend payout ratio is 0%
How has MKP Mobility allocated its funds?
Companies resources are allocated to majorly unproductive assets like Inventory, Accounts Receivable, Short Term Loans & Advances
How strong is MKP Mobility balance sheet?
Balance sheet of MKP Mobility is strong. It shouldn't have solvency or liquidity issues.
Is the profitablity of MKP Mobility improving?
Yes, profit is increasing. The profit of MKP Mobility is ₹1.67 Crs for TTM, ₹1.14 Crs for Mar 2024 and -₹0.26 Crs for Mar 2023.
Is the debt of MKP Mobility increasing or decreasing?
Yes, The debt of MKP Mobility is increasing. Latest debt of MKP Mobility is ₹2.07 Crs as of Sep-24. This is greater than Mar-24 when it was -₹0.86 Crs.
Is MKP Mobility stock expensive?
MKP Mobility is not expensive. Latest PE of MKP Mobility is 30.4, while 3 year average PE is 130. Also latest EV/EBITDA of MKP Mobility is 303 while 3yr average is 592.
Has the share price of MKP Mobility grown faster than its competition?
MKP Mobility has given better returns compared to its competitors. MKP Mobility has grown at ~43.59% over the last 7yrs while peers have grown at a median rate of 11.89%
Is the promoter bullish about MKP Mobility?
Promoters stake in the company seems stable, and we need to go through filings and allocation of resources to gauge promoter bullishness. Latest quarter promoter holding in MKP Mobility is 68.47% and last quarter promoter holding is 68.47%.
Are mutual funds buying/selling MKP Mobility?
The mutual fund holding of MKP Mobility is stable. The current mutual fund holding in MKP Mobility is 0.17% while previous quarter holding is 0.17%.